Thursday, October 18, 2007

New "Anti-Semites" Week of Oct. 11 - Oct. 17 2007

WHO: The European media
WHY: "Aided by a pre-existing anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism, European media have been willing to demonize the United States and Israel while remaining largely silent on the merger of their continent with the Islamic world."
FOR THE RECORD: "Right at the top of the list four countries share first place - Finland, Iceland, Norway and the Netherlands. These northern European states scrupulously respect press freedom in their own countries but also speak up for it elsewhere, for example recently in Eritrea and Zimbabwe. The highest-scoring country outside Europe is Canada, which comes fifth. ... The 15 member-countries of the European Union (EU) all score well except for Italy (40th), where news diversity is under serious threat. Prime minister Silvio Berlusconi is turning up the pressure on the state-owned television stations, has named his henchmen to help run them and continues to combine his job as head of government with being boss of a privately-owned media group." Reporters Without Borders, "Reporters Without Borders publishes the first worldwide press freedom index," Reporters Without Borders Website, October 2002
SOURCE: 'Fjordman', "Conservative Bloggers Fight for Free Speech," Global Politician, 17 October 2007

WHO: League of Polish Families, polish right-wing political party
WHY: "The 30-second television spot by the League of Polish Families mixes images of Polish troops in Iraq and violence in the Middle East with pictures of President Lech Kaczynski wearing a skull cap on a visit to the Western Wall in Jerusalem. 'This is an attempt to attract people with anti-Semitic views,' said Piotr Kadlcik, the leader of the Jewish Religious Communities in Poland, which released a statement condemning the advert."
FOR THE RECORD: "Roman Giertych, leader of the League of Polish Families, defended the tv spot, saying it was not anti-Semitic while insisting there is a connection between the war in Iraq and Israel. 'One can be against the war in Iraq without being an anti-Semite,' Giertych said. 'This ad shows the cooperation between Poland and the U.S., and Poland and Israel — we have a right to criticize it,' he said. 'The war in Iraq threatens our country, and this is why the Polish troops should be pulled out from Iraq as soon as possible.'" EJP, "Election campaign tv spot by extreme-right party anti-Semitic?," European Jewish Press, 16 October 2007
SOURCE: Reuters, "Polish Jews condemn election ads as anti-Semitic," Reuters, 17 October 2007

WHO: David Himmelberger and his Himmelberger Gallery in San Francisco
WHY: Because the Gallery "has decided to cancel plans to publish an art catalogue of one of its represented artists, noted author Alan Kaufman, who is under contract to the gallery. The decision is due to use of the word Zionism in the catalogue’s title ‘Visionary Expressionism:
A Zionist Art.' ... 'And how this same Zionism, distorted and vilified by one of the most sordid disinformation campaigns in history, became the bete noire of the present day, a refugee of a word, a pariah of an idea, is one of the most sordid instances in the long, cruel campaign to marginalize and, ultimately, to destroy the Jewish People. Let us, then, be perfectly frank about one thing. To vilify, marginalize, suppress or outlaw Zionism politically, socially or culturally, for any reason whatever, is to wish no less then murderous extinction upon every Jewish man, woman and child in the world today.'"

FOR THE RECORD: "Kaufman had solicited brief essays from friends such as David Twersky, a contributing editor for The New York Sun and senior adviser to the American Jewish Congress’s executive director; David Rosenberg, co-author of 'The Book of J' and author of 'Abraham: The First Historical Biography,' and Israeli author Etgar Keret. Kaufman, author of the memoir 'Jew Boy' and the novel 'Matches,' also penned an essay for the catalog. 'His reaction to that was immediate and profound. He pointed to the title of the catalog and said, ‘There’s no way I’ll do that, never,’' Kaufman said. He claimed that Himmelberger told him such a presentation was antithetical to the aims of the gallery, which include fostering international understanding by rejecting nationalism." Josh Richman, "Bay Area Artists Fight Over Framing of Mideast Conflict," The Forward, 17 October 2007 Also, from source cited below: "Himmelberger said that such a presentation was antithetical to the aims of the gallery, which promotes “international understanding” and forswears all forms of nationalism and religion."
SOURCE: 'chutzpaleh' "San Francisco Art Gallery Censors Writing and Art Work as Too Zionist," Oy Bay! 17 October 2007

WHO: Yeted Ne'eman, the flagship journal of Degel HaTorah, the "Lithuanian wing" of the Ashkenazi Haredim and the Israeli "United Torah Judaism" political party.
WHY: "The cartoon showed a man dressed in shorts and sandals wearing a skullcap and trimmed black beard, representing a Shas follower, in cahoots with a secular person representing Kadima. Wearing a big grin, the two were dumping a rock labeled "2008 cuts" on the head of a Haredi man. The symbols appear obvious, lacking sophistication, and according to Shas, loaded with anti-Semitism and racism of the sort Ashkenazi ultra-Orthodox feel about Sephardi Haredim."
FOR THE RECORD: "'I don't see why a cartoon is necessary when the real picture is much worse,' said MK Yakov Litzman, chairman of UTJ. 'I am surprised to hear that they are leaving the religious lobby. I expected them to leave the government,' quipped MK Moshe Gafni, another member of UTJ. Litzman acknowledged that there is bickering every year over the budget, but he charged Shas with 'disgracing us.' 'The budget for yeshivas was NIS 82.5 million last year and all of a sudden it is NIS 4 million,' he said. 'Do you have any other explanation for this except humiliation for the Haredim? Shas does not have so many yeshivas ... and in any case they will take care of themselves [from inside the government].'"
SOURCE: Yair Ettinger, "Cartoon spat prompts Shas to quit Knesset religious lobby," Ha'aretz, 16 October 2007

WHO: Scottish Socialist Party (SSP)
WHY: "Kelvin branch of the Scottish Socialist Party (SSP) has submitted a motion to the 2007 SSP conference calling on the party to support the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign and its campaign for a boycott of Israel."
FOR THE RECORD: "The Stirling University Students Association (SUSA) senate have voted overwhelmingly to boycott Israeli goods, in protest at that country’s on-going occupation of Palestine and persecution of Palestinians. As a result of the decision - reached by a 35-1 majority, with only one abstention - a referendum of students is to be held in November, asking if they wish to support a motion to ‘ Oppose Anti-Semitism and Oppose the Occupation’. ... The boycott, disinvestment and sanctions policy is supported by most of the Israel peace movement, a majority of the population of Palestine and has already won support in universities in England Wales and Scotland through it being an official policy of the main university and college lecturers union (AUT). The policy is increasingly being recognised as the most effective and peaceful way of making the Israel government realise that their actions, including ignoring UN resolutions on borders, the construction of the internationally condemned apartheid wall, and the blatant disregard for Palestinians’ human rights, are not acceptable. ... The Scottish Socialist Party agreed at its conference to reconfirm its support for the boycott of Israel. The motion which was passed includes a call for the party to campaign on the issue in all areas, including through the students’ movement." Iain Campbell, "Stirling students’ association vote to boycott Israeli goods," Scottish Socialist Voice, Issue 284, 26 October 2006
SOURCE: Stan Crooke, "The 'Zionophobes' that pushed even the SWP to resign in protest," Worker's Liberty, 14 October 2007

WHO: Officials and residents of Newton Highlands, Massachusetts opposed to the building of a building a 12,000-square-foot synagogue in a residential neighborhood.
WHY: "Relations between the religious group and the city grew tense, with Beth Menachem members suggesting that officials who opposed its interests were anti-Semitic. The fighting roiled the community of Newton, where an estimated one-third of residents are Jewish."
FOR THE RECORD: "Neighbors say the site's lack of parking at its headquarters in a home at 229 Dedham St. has created dangerous traffic congestion at Dedham's intersection with Rachel Road. It is near Countryside Elementary, the city's largest primary school. 'The current level of risk to pedestrians and drivers at this intersection is at the tipping point. Further stress with a huge structure and overflowing parking needs posed danger that is unacceptable,' wrote a group of 10 neighboring homeowners in an Aug. 7 letter to the board. Neighbors Ellen and Charles Lipson echoed the sentiments with an Aug. 9 letter of their own, asking aldermen to delay the project until a solution to the "current and future traffic nightmare" could be found. ... The implication of anti-Semitism was one that Lipof, who is Jewish and the son of Rabbi Emily Lipof of Temple Ohabei Shalom in Brookline, said he found deeply offensive. 'It never has been about religion," Rick Lipof said last week. 'It's about a use of land that is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood.'"
SOURCE: Erica Noonan, "Jewish center wins OK from city," The Boston Globe, 14 October 2007

WHO: Ron Olive, retired foreign counterintelligence agent and author of “Capturing Jonathan Pollard”
WHY: For Capturing Israeli spy against the United States Jonathan Pollard: "Olive is credited with having deciphered much of Pollard’s espionage activity, and then coaxing the confession which led to his arrest in 1985. ... Israeli leaders and several American Jewish groups have continually excoriated the U.S. government for its delivery of the life sentence for Pollard, whose employer, the Israeli government was – after all – a U.S. political ally. Calls persist for Pollard’s release from prison, and criticism – even accusations of anti-Semitism have trickled down to Olive’s own role in the saga."
FOR THE RECORD: "Pollard, a civilian intelligence analyst working at the U.S. Naval Investigative Service’s Anti-Terrorist Alert Center, had stolen what was, by all accounts, a prodigious amount of highly sensitive national security information. Olive says his book is the story of how our national security system, 'totally broke down ... and about the devastation he (Pollard) caused.' ... 'He gave a foreign government our capabilities – that’s like giving the keys to the kingdom to a foreign government,' he says. 'It costs billions and billions and billions of dollars to rebuild a system once it’s been stolen.'"
SOURCE: Nancy Pasternack, "The true story behind Jonathan Pollard," Appeal-Democrat, 12 October 2007

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

New "Anti-Semites" Week of Oct. 4 - Oct. 10 2007

WHO: Egypt
WHY: Apparently because in the first century CE, Greeks and Romans in Egypt instigated the first anti-Jewish pogrom in recorded history in the Greek city of Alexandria.
FOR THE RECORD: Alexandria was a Greek/Macedonian transplant into Egypt founded after the conquest of the country by Alexander the Great and the cited progrom was between Greeks and Romans and Jews - not Egyptians - in Greek Alexandria under Roman control. "But still conflicts perpetually arose with the Greeks, and although the Roman governors did every day punish many of them, yet the violence grew worse. But at this time, when there were tumults in other places as well, the disorders among the Greeks and Jews became even more violent. ..." Flavius Josephus, Jewish War, 2.487-498. The obvious implication of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs piece is to continue with the vilification of modern Egypt.
SOURCE: Interview with Pieter W. van der Horst, "The Egyptian Beginning of Anti-Semitism's Long History," Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, October 2007

WHO: Europe in general
WHY: For having the audacity to criticize Israeli policies twoard the native Palestinian people: "Oil-funded propaganda combined with latent anti-semitism and large-scale immigration of anti-semitic populations has turned Europe into a cauldron of simmering anti-Israel hate that has led to academic boycotts of Israel, and that hatred and ignorance is manifesting itself on American campuses such as Columbia."
FOR THE RECORD: "Europeans, however, generally view resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as key to reshaping the Middle East, fostering durable stability, and decreasing the threats posed to both the United States and Europe by terrorism and Islamic militancy. The EU’s first-ever security strategy, released in December 2003, cites resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a top EU priority. Many European officials charge that Washington has focused too much on Iraq and has an unbalanced, excessively pro-Israeli policy. In this view, the United States is alienating the broader Muslim world, which perceives a U.S. double standard at work. European leaders have clamored for the United States to 'do more' to get Israeli-Palestinian negotiations back on track, precisely because they recognize that only sustained U.S. engagement at the highest levels will force the parties to the conflict, especially Israel, back to the negotiating table." Kristin Archick (Congressional Research Service), "European Views and Policies Toward the Middle East," CRS Web, 9 March 2005
SOURCE: Gamaliel Isaac, "A History Lesson for Columbia," Intellectual Conservative, 10 October 2007

WHO: Sir Kingsley William Amis, Wiki: "(April 16, 1922 – October 22, 1995) was an English novelist, poet, critic, and teacher. He wrote more than twenty novels, three collections of poetry, short stories, radio and television scripts, and books of social and literary criticism. He fathered English novelist Martin Amis."
WHY: "Professor Terry Eagleton, a Marxist professor of cultural theory at the University of Manchester, had made the accusations a preface to his new book Ideology: An Introduction. He called the Lucky Jim author 'a racist, anti-Semitic boor, a drink-sodden, self-hating reviler of women, gays and liberals'."
FOR THE RECORD: "However, Sir Kingsley's second wife, the novelist Elizabeth Jane Howard, and his homosexual brother-in-law Colin Howard have sprung to his defence. In a letter to the Daily Telegraph, Ms Howard wrote: 'Kingsley was never a racist, nor an anti-Semitic boor. Our four great friends who witnessed our wedding were three Jews and one homosexual.' She added: 'I never heard him behave in a racist manner towards Jews, nor when he was teaching in Nashville did he accept the prevailing attitude of the racist whites against the black people there.' And Mr Howard, who lived with Sir Kingsley and Ms Howard for 17 years, explained: 'During that time, we became very close and affectionate friends. Prof Eagleton is, at the least, careless in his description of Kingsley as homophobic.' He continued: 'Calling him anti-Semitic should be actionable were it not so absurd.'"
SOURCE: "Amis family denies 'racist' allegations," InTheNews.co.uk, 10 October 2007

WHO: Archbishop Desmond Tutu [Generally speaking, once the accusation is thrown once it is repeated over and over again, so once we list a victim of this libel one time we usually do not bother to do so over and over again. However, this particular charge against Desmond Tutu, we just couldn't resist listing him twice.]
WHY: "Also attending the Conference is anti-Semite Desmond Tutu (Tutu not an anti-Semite because he is anti-Israel---he is an anti-Semite because he hates JEWS. ... Boston conference participant, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, is another major contributor to the Durban Strategy. In a speech at a 2002 Sabeel conference, Tutu repeatedly labeled Israel an "apartheid state," and compared the Israeli government to Stalin and Hitler. Following criticism of Tutu's anti-Semitic and anti-Israel statements, the University of St. Thomas (Minneapolis-St. Paul) revoked his invitation to their spring 2008 conference."
FOR THE RECORD: "Archbishop Desmond Tutu will speak at a Minnesota university after all. Less than a week after it was revealed that Tutu's appearance at the University of St. Thomas was nixed over comments deemed offensive to Jews, the university's president announced Wednesday he had made a mistake by disinviting Tutu. ... Jewish critics pointed to a speech Tutu delivered in 2002 in which he compared Israeli practices to those of the apartheid regime in South Africa. The university's decision to rescind the invitation to Tutu, a Nobel Peace Prize winner and internationally recognized humanitarian, prompted an uproar and revived claims that U.S. Jews seek to quash public criticism of Israel. On Tuesday, Anti-Defamation League National Director Abraham Foxman wrote to Dease urging him to reconsider his decision about disinviting Tutu. University officials did not say whether Foxman's letter affected Dease's decision, but they said Dease received a steady stream of phone calls and e-mails when the story broke last week." "Tutu reinvited to Minnesota college," JTA News, 10 October 2007
SOURCE: Yid with Lid "Boston to Host Sabeel's Israel Hatefest on Oct. 26/7," 10 October 2007

WHO: Ashkan Dejagah, 21, a German-Iranian soccer player for Bundesliga club VfB Wolfsburg
WHY: For withdrawing from an upcoming match against Israel to be held in Tel Aviv citing "personal reasons," that is, not wanting to play Israel or violate Iranian law by going to Israel. To quote the source: "Surely this nasty little anti-Semite should be shown up for what he is, rather than indulged for his SO CALLED "plausible" reason? If he had said he wasn't going to play against a Muslim team, or of he said that he wouldn't play against a homosexual team (Chelsea, for example...joke) then I bet he would be castigated for his intolerance. But when it's Jews...."
FOR THE RECORD: "An Iranian-born player in Germany's under-21 national soccer team has withdrawn from an upcoming match against Israel citing "personal reasons", the German Football Association (DFB) said on Monday. ... "He came to us citing personal reasons that seemed very plausible," DFB spokesman Jens Grittner said. Dejagah could not be reached for comment, but tabloid daily Bild quoted him as saying his motive was political. 'It has political reasons. Everyone knows that I am German-Iranian,' he said of the decision to withdraw. Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has refused to recognize Israel's right to exist and Iranian citizens are forbidden from travelling to Israel." Catherine Bosley, "Soccer-Iran-born German player withdraws from Israel match," Reuters, 8 October 2007
SOURCE: David Vance, "BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON ANTI-SEMITISM," A Tangled Web, 10 October 2007

WHO: Jeff Halper, Israeli founder of ICAHD. Wiki: "The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) describes itself as 'a non-violent, direct-action group originally established to oppose and resist Israeli demolition of Palestinian homes in the Occupied Territories.' It was founded by Jeff Halper, a former professor of Anthropology at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. ICAHD opposes what it calls the 'matrix of control' that Israel has established over the West Bank and East Jerusalem and sees the dismantling of this control as the only path towards peace. They also actively campaign against what they believe are Human rights violations and an emerging apartheid."
WHY: "Israeli human rights activist and author Jeff Halper argues that in the Israel-Palestine conflict the two-state solution is dead and that apartheid has taken over. ... 'We use apartheid in a very precise way. We don't use it as a slogan. We have been very careful about it. Apartheid is a system that can't be exported,' Halper told a group of about 40 people during a talk Sunday at Memorial United Church of Christ in Fitchburg. An apartheid system is one of separation in which one population separates itself from the others, Halper said. 'And that's what Israel calls its policy.' The other element of apartheid is domination, he said. 'One population separates itself from the others and then dominate them. Permanently and institutionally.' Israel's offer to withdraw from 95 percent of the West Bank will create not peace, but rather a Palestinian prison state, said Halper, who has been called 'a Jewish anti-Semite.'"
FOR THE RECORD: This is just another example of smearing people that are critical of Israel and Israeli policy with the "anti-Semite" label.
SOURCE: Samara Kalk Derby, "Activist/author calls Israel-Palestine conflict apartheid," The Capital Times (Madison WI), 8 October 2007

WHO: The Washington Post and its contributior, Geoffrey Wheatcroft (also a regular contributor to The Atlantic, The New York Times, The Wall Street journal, and The Guardian)
WHY: "Bernard Lewis once noted that an anti-Semite is a person who criticizes Israel while refusing to acknowledge other countries have similar flaws. The same may be said for Mr. Wheatcroft and the Washington Post."
FOR THE RECORD: "Former literary editor of London's Spectator, Wheatcroft describes himself as "a genuine neutral or agnostic" on the Arab-Israeli conflict, seeing right and wrong on both sides. In this dispassionate yet opinionated history, which sweeps from Theodore Herzl's Zionist dream to Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin's assassination in 1995, Wheatcroft condemns the 1975 United Nations resolution equating Zionism with racism as gravely malicious, a reflection of the Arab states' malignancy. While praising Israel as "a unique island of constitutional government in the Levant," he echoes the observation of U.S. journalist I.F. Stone that Zionism involved a psychological act of denial along with a physical act of displacement of Palestine's Arab population." From the Publishers Weekly review of Geoffrey Wheatcroft's "The Controversy of Zion: Jewish Nationalism, the Jewish State, and the Unresolved Jewish Dilemma" as presented on the Amazon.Com page for the book.
SOURCE: Mark Graber, "Double Standards at the Washington Post," Balkinization, 8 October 2007

WHO: The play "Jewtopia" and apparently its authors, Bryan Fogel and Sam Wolfson
WHY: "But that's Jewtopia in a shell-free nut for you: a series of clichés and worn-out jokes about, for and written by Jews that is meant to honour Yiddish humour and resilience to atrocities but comes dangerously close to self-inflicted racial profiling and internalized anti-Semitism."
FOR THE RECORD: "There's nothing here that Jackie Mason and Mel Brooks haven't milked for comedic effect either in a stand-up routine or onscreen. Fogel and Wolfson's only contribution to the cause of Borscht-belt humour is introducing the gross-out sensibility of a Ben Stiller or an Adam Sandler to the mix in a desperate attempt to appeal to a younger, urban audience."
SOURCE: Kamal Al-Solaylee, "Clichéd stereotypes. Yeah, we get it. Ha Ha ... not," Toronto Globe & Mail, 6 October 2007

WHO: The Google Search Engine, the Oxford English Dictionary, and Rudyard Kipling
WHY: Google: Because its search engine pulls up particular anti-Semitic websites when the search term "Jew" is entered. Oxford English Dictionary: because it included these definitions under the word "Jew:" "The first was the noun - 'Person who drives hard bargains, usurer' and the second the verb 'to Jew' - 'cheat, bargain with (person) to lower his price.'" And Rudyard Kipling: "I read Rudyard Kipling's brilliant teen novel 'Stalky & Co.' for the first time and was perplexed by this passage: 'Pay me my interest, or I'll charge you interest on interest. Remember I've got your note-of-hand!' shouted Beetle. 'You're a cold-blooded Jew,' Stalky groaned.'"
FOR THE RECORD: Google: "special explanation written by Google insists that while the company in no way agrees with the content of such websites, they have no plans to remove it or others. Google they claim, simply reflects what is up there on the web, without issuing judgment." The Oxford English Dictionary: "the Oxford University Press's position that the dictionary was there simply to record the use of words and their history, not to act as a guardian by keeping language clean." And Rudyard Kipling: "I know that Kipling, like a number of other famous late-Victorian writers, was more than a little anti-Semitic, but that doesn't stop me from enjoying his writing, or that of Graham Greene, Evelyn Waugh and even the sainted George Orwell, who all displayed similar tendencies at one stage or another of their careers. We will gain nothing by posthumously sanitizing their works, just as trying to censor dictionaries and search engines won't help us to understand and confront mankind's most ancient hatred."
SOURCE: Anshel Pfeffer, "Moves to censor the dictionary may not help fight anti-Semitism," Ha'aretz, 6 October 2007

WHO: State Rep. Marlin Schneider (D-Wisconsn Rapids) and others asking for a full investigation of the USS Liberty incident in 1967
WHY: "Schneider became interested in the matter in 1998, when he got an e-mail from an Oshkosh man asking whether the federal government could be petitioned about an investigation of the attack. 'I thought it was a no-brainer, an attack on an American ship in which a young sailor from Fond du Lac, Duane Margraaf, was killed,' Schneider said. 'But someone warned me that this would be viewed as an assault on the nation state of Israel. As soon as you say something about it, the Jewish lobby crawls all over you, and they call you an anti-Semite.'"
FOR THE RECORD: "His resolution went nowhere, and the Assembly decided not to petition the federal government about anything, after which Schneider's fruitless resolutions asked other states to petition Congress for an investigation. The men who served on the Liberty believe that the attack was deliberately carried out by the Israelis. 'I talked to some of the guys who were on the ship who said that Israeli planes flew over for hours on a sunny day when the American flag was clearly displayed and even tipped their wings,' Schneider said. 'But all the sudden they launched a violent attack. A distress signal was sent to the Sixth Fleet, which sent planes to intercept the planes attacking, but Lyndon Johnson and Robert McNamara literally called the planes back. They were not allowed to defend the ship.' Despite the Tribune investigation, Schneider doesn't think that Congress will do anything about the matter."
SOURCE: Anita Weier, "'67 spy ship affair resurfaces: State pol pursued probe of attack," The Capital Times (Madison, WI), 4 October 2007

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

New "Anti-Semites" Week of Sept. 27 - Oct. 3 2007

WHO: Israeli elites: Israeli "barons of the press," "capitalists" and of course the Israeli "academic world"
WHY: For questioning - in any way whatsoever - any of the founding myths of Israel or the nationalist ideology of Zionism or in any way voicing sympathy for the legitimate grievances of the indigenous Palestinian people.
FOR THE RECORD: This is just a standard reiteration of the tired canard that "anti-Zionism" = "anti-Semitism," that is, if you question the nationalist ideology of Zionism or any of its founding myths, you must by extension be a Jew-hating Nazi lusting after the Jewish blood. The whole "anti-Zionism" = "anti-Semitism" is a creative reversal and adaptation of the traditional Christian blood libel against Jews, now converted in a similar blood libel directed against anyone who questions the ideology of Zionism, the state of Israel (or its ethnocentric basis), or any Israeli policy or practice. By Gadi Eshel's definition, most Israelis are in fact raging anti-Semites.
SOURCE: Gadi Eshel, "In other words, anti-Semitism," Ha'aretz, 3 October 2007

WHO: Agatha Christie, the world's most successful author of murder mysteries who died in 1976.
WHY: No specific instances are cited, just "the casual anti-Semitism and xenophobia found throughout the early novels."
FOR THE RECORD: "She [Laura Thompson] defends Christie against charges of snobbery and racism, arguing that the novels only reflected the views of their day, though she prefers to consider a passing remark made in a letter – 'Like all Dagoes, he couldn’t swim' – rather than address the casual anti-Semitism and xenophobia found throughout the early novels. Raymond Chandler, Michael Dibdin and Ruth Rendell are quoted as critics of Christie’s plotting and characterization; T. S. Eliot, A. L. Rowse and Michel Houellebecq are marshalled for the defence. But Thompson does not engage with the novels themselves."
SOURCE: Lindsay Duguid, "Agatha Christie's anti-novels," The Times Literary Supplement, 3 October 2007

WHO: Conservationists and residents of Manchester (UK) who want to maintain the historic 600-acre Heaton Park
WHY: For opposing the destruction of the park to construct a new school, King David's Juniors, when the school could - and did - remain in its current location. "Now this highly-sensitive issue has been resolved I hope the local community will unite and condemn a small minority who have sought to use it as an excuse for ill concealed anti-Semitism." No one else mentioned in the article appears to have noticed any racism or anti-Semitism.
FOR THE RECORD: "The 600-acre park was bought from the Egerton family in the early 19th century. It is one of Manchester's most popular nature spots and recently underwent an £11m restoration. Local MPs Ivan Lewis and Graham Stringer held talks with the council and school bosses over the summer to agree a compromise. Mr Lewis, MP for Bury South, said the decision to refurbish the entire King David campus would be in the best interests of pupils and green groups."
SOURCE: Yakub Qureshi, "'School in the park' scrapped," Manchester Evening News, 3 October 2007

WHO: Archbishop Desmond Tutu, South African Nobel Laureate and famous anti-Apartheid activist
WHY: "During that speech, titled 'Occupation Is Oppression,' Tutu lambasted the Israeli government for its treatment of Palestinians in occupied territories. While a transcription clearly suggests his criticism was aimed at the Israeli government ('We don't criticize the Jewish people,' he said during the speech. 'We criticize, we will criticize when they need to be criticized, the government of Israel'), pro-Israeli organizations such as the Zionist Organization of America went on the offensive and protested campus appearances by Tutu, accusing him of anti-Semitism."
FOR THE RECORD: "Hennes says the input officials received from 'the Jewish community' in this case was confined to Swiler and a few rabbis teaching within St. Thomas's Center for Jewish-Christian Learning. 'I think there's a consensus in the Jewish community that his words were offensive,' Swiler reiterates.That was news to Marv Davidov, an adjunct professor within the Justice and Peace Studies program. 'As a Jew who experienced real anti-Semitism as a child, I'm deeply disturbed that a man like Tutu could be labeled anti-Semitic and silenced like this,' he says. 'I deeply resent the Israeli lobby trying to silence any criticism of its policy. It does a great disservice to Israel and to all Jews.'"
SOURCE: Matt Snyders, "Banning Desmond Tutu," City Pages (Minneapolis), 3 October 2007

WHO: Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London
WHY: Not many of examples are given in the article, just a lot of ranting: "'[Livingstone] is a bad guy, he's a miserable guy, he's an anti-Semite, he's a racist,' says Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D-Brooklyn). 'He believes the state of Israel shouldn't exist, never should have been created.' ... 'The man is an anti-Semite. The man compared a reporter to a nazi concentration guard,' Hikind says. ... Last year the Simon Weisenthal Center even blamed Livingstone's past remarks for increasing anti-Semitism in London, saying last October: 'Ken Livingstone has made it crystal clear that he is more interested in embracing terrorist proponents than dealing with anti-Semitism.'"
FOR THE RECORD: "Racism is a uniquely reactionary ideology, used to justify the greatest crimes in history - the slave trade, the extermination of all original inhabitants of the Caribbean, the elimination of every native inhabitant of Tasmania, apartheid. The Holocaust was the ultimate, "industrialised" expression of racist barbarity. ... As mayor, I have pressed for police action over anti-semitic attacks at the highest level, and my administration has backed a series of initiatives of importance to the Jewish community, including hosting the Anne Frank exhibition at City Hall and measures to ensure the go-ahead for the north London eruv. ... Throughout the 1970s, I worked happily with the Board of Deputies in campaigns against the National Front. Problems began when, as leader of the Greater London Council, I rejected the board's request that I should fund only Jewish organisations that it approved of. The Board of Deputies was unhappy that I funded Jewish organisations campaigning for gay rights and others that disagreed with policies of the Israeli government. Relations with the board took a dramatic turn for the worse when I opposed Israel's illegal invasion of Lebanon, culminating in the massacres at the Palestinian camps of Sabra and Shatila. The board also opposed my involvement in the successful campaign in 1982 to convince the Labour party to recognise the PLO as the legitimate voice of the Palestinian people. The fundamental issue on which we differ, as Henry Grunwald knows, is not anti-semitism - which my administration has fought tooth and nail - but the policies of successive Israeli governments. To avoid manufactured misunderstandings, the policies of Israeli governments are not analogous to Nazism. They do not aim at the systematic extermination of the Palestinian people, in the way Nazism sought the annihilation of the Jews. ... All racist and anti-semitic attacks must be stamped out. However, the reality is that the great bulk of racist attacks in Europe today are on black people, Asians and Muslims - and they are the primary targets of the extreme right. For 20 years Israeli governments have attempted to portray anyone who forcefully criticises the policies of Israel as anti-semitic. The truth is the opposite: the same universal human values that recognise the Holocaust as the greatest racist crime of the 20th century require condemnation of the policies of successive Israeli governments - not on the absurd grounds that they are Nazi or equivalent to the Holocaust, but because ethnic cleansing, discrimination and terror are immoral." Ken Livingstone, "This is about Israel, not anti-semitism," The
Guardian, 4 March 2005
SOURCE: "Bloomberg's London Visit Incenses Jewish Leaders," CBS News, 2 October 2007

WHO: Gerald Schiller, author of a Letter to the Editor to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, "('Abandoning Israel,' Sept. 21 and PghTrib.com)"
WHY: "Letter-writer Gerald Schiller thinks that Israel's Mossad might be feeding us fabricated intelligence to keep us in Iraq ... What's next? Discovering that Elvis has been flipping burgers at a McDonald's in Detroit all these years? Excessive liberalism and a bad case of anti-Semitism obviously have altered Mr. Schiller's ability to think clearly."
FOR THE RECORD: "Israeli intelligence overplayed the threat posed by Iraq and reinforced the U.S. and British assessment that Saddam Hussein had large amounts of weapons of mass destruction, a retired Israeli general said Thursday. The Israeli assessment may have been colored by politics, including a desire to see the Iraqi leader toppled, said Shlomo Brom, who was a senior Israeli military intelligence officer and is now a researcher with Israel's top strategic think tank. Brom stopped short of accusing Israeli intelligence officials of intentionally misleading Britain and the United States. His assertions could, however, undermine the reputation of the Israeli intelligence service, one of the most respected in the world. The Israeli military declined comment, while other experts said Brom was exaggerating. ... Brom told The Associated Press in an interview Thursday that 'Israeli intelligence was a full partner with the United States and Britain in developing a false picture of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction capability.' He said Israeli intelligence 'badly overestimated the Iraqi threat to Israel and reinforced the American and British belief that the weapons existed.' Brom said the Israeli assessment may have been influenced by politics. 'Israel has no reason to regret the outcome of the war in Iraq,' he wrote, noting Saddam was an implacable enemy." Associated Press, "General: Israelis exaggerated Iraq threat," USA Today, 4 December 2003
SOURCE: Darlene Walter, "Defending Israel," Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 2 October 2007

WHO: University of California - Irvine
WHY: "UC Irvine routinely hosts events at which speakers inaccurately call Israel an apartheid state, blame 'the Zionist Jews' for the Sept. 11 terror attacks and other problems in the world, and accuse 'the Zionist Jews' of bullying, conspiratorial conduct, and trickery."
FOR THE RECORD: "The conflagration in the Middle East has roiled American college campuses for decades, and as the violence continues abroad, the debate rages on in the United States. For several years, the flash point of this conflict in Southern California has been UC Irvine, a dubious distinction that was again highlighted last week when the university's chancellor met with representatives of the Orange County Jewish community at their request in the wake of escalating rhetoric from both sides. ... 'When I got to UCI, I did not have any idea that I would be hit hard with such a strong anti-Israel sentiment,' said Reut Cohen, a third-year student active in pro-Israel groups. 'It's really strange because Irvine in general is very Christian (and) very conservative.' Marya Bangee, a third-year student who serves as spokeswoman for the Muslim Students Union, echoed that sentiment, but from the opposite perspective. 'We're in the middle of conservative Orange County, and that is obviously a difficult atmosphere to be discussing political issues here,' she said. 'There are definitely organizations ... that are trying to shut down free speech with regard to Israel.' Tensions escalated throughout the spring as former President Jimmy Carter visited the campus to discuss his latest book, which is highly critical of Israel. Last month, the Muslim Student Union held an annual week of events sharply criticizing Israel, and one member of the group had a bizarre run-in with an FBI agent who appeared to be monitoring students on campus. Jewish groups have raised concerns that campus events ostensibly criticizing Israeli policy have crossed over into anti-Semitism, while some Muslims have complained that rhetoric from the other side denigrates their religion. Still, Vice Chancellor Manuel Gomez said the campus has an obligation to allow free speech to be stretched to its limits. 'If we don't allow the discussion and the debate of these ideas within a university community, where there are so many rich intellectual resources, where do we allow it?' he asked rhetorically. ... " Dan Laidman, "Orange County not geopolitical hotbed," Copley News Service, 3 June 2007
SOURCE: Susan Tuchman, "UC Irvine," Zionist Organization of America Press Release, 1 October 2007

WHO: Woody Allen, Jewish-American comedian, actor, and film director.
WHY: "The charge of anti-Semitism has been leveled at Woody Allen so many times as to sound unoriginal. Without rehearsing all the evidence and counter-arguments, the very least one can say is that, when it comes to seizing on a tired stereotype and utterly exhausting it, Allen has shown himself a modern master of unoriginality."
FOR THE RECORD: "I have been called a self hating Jew any number of times over the years, sometimes based on jokes I've made in my cabaret act or films and particularly when I wrote an op-ed piece for the New York Times suggesting that it was not only indecent but not great public relations for Israel to have their soldiers go door to door and preemptively break the hands of Palestinians. Following that piece I was named Pig of the Month by the Jewish Defense League and they descended upon the venue I play jazz at with a live pig to present to me. These issues are always so sensitive and it's impossible not to offend but be assured that I long for the same peaceful, humanitarian solution that seems so simple and yet remains elusive." Woody Allen, Letter to Ed Koch dated 28 May 2002, "Ed Koch vs. Woody Allen on Anti-Semitism," BeliefNet
SOURCE: Benjamin A. Plotinsky, "Mere Anarchy by Woody Allen," Commentary Magazine, October 2007

WHO: The American Latino population
WHY: The article doesn't exactly mention what views are popular in the Latino community that they consider "hardcore anti-Semitic." Quotes: "'For Latinos, their perceptions of Jews, if any exist at all, are in part framed by their current economic encounter, principally in an employee-employer relationship,' Steven Windmueller, L.A. dean of Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, wrote in the book 'California Jews.' ... The Pew Hispanic Center reported in April that only 44 percent of Latinos hold a favorable view of Jews, compared with 77 percent of all Americans. The negative feelings are strongest among Latino Catholics. A survey conducted by the ADL in 2005 found that 35 percent of foreign-born Latinos held "hardcore" anti-Semitic beliefs. That was down from 44 percent of those surveyed in 2002."
FOR THE RECORD: "The stereotypes swing both ways, though. This reporter was recently told a story about students at a Jewish day school being asked during last year's immigration debate to share what they knew about Latinos. 'They're gardeners,' was one response. 'They're nannies' was another. 'They are not hateful stereotypes. They are just stereotypes borne from inexperience,' said Rabbi Gary Greenebaum, AJC's national director of inter-religious affairs. He said programs that bring Latinos and Jews into communion help dispel myths about both groups. With the Latino population of the United States expected to grow significantly during the next few decades, many Jewish leaders are attempting to strengthen bonds between the communities. ... Danoch, who is fluent in Spanish from the three years of his youth he spent in Uruguay, where his father worked for the Jewish Agency for Israel, thinks outreach to Latinos is given too short shrift by many American Jews."
SOURCE: Brad A. Greenberg, "Latino pastors celebrate Sukkot and Israel in Westwood," JewishJournal.Com, 28 September 2007

WHO: Barack Obama, Democratic presidential candidate
WHY: For calling for global neclear disarmament: "Nukes - M.A.D. - kept us safe. And the same deterrent value exists today (except against jihadists). And nuclear parity is what kept India and Pakistan from attacking each other in recent years. NUKES FOR PEACE! If Obama REALLY wanted to make the world safer, instead of promoting the idiotic “dream” of disarmament, he’d be backing more NMD. And nukes are the ultimate defense for Israel. Does Obama want Israel to try to deter the arab states without them!?!? If so, then Obama is either an anti-Semite or and idiot or both."
FOR THE RECORD: "Democrat Barack Obama called for ridding the world of nuclear weapons Tuesday and offered his early opposition to the Iraq war as evidence of sound judgment that trumps his lack of Washington experience. Obama argued that U.S. policy is still focused on the defunct Soviet Union instead of combatting the nuclear threat from rogue nations and terrorists. The United States shouldn't unilaterally disarm, he said, but it must work with other nations to phase out weapons and control atomic material. 'Here's what I'll say as president: 'America seeks a world in which there are no nuclear weapons,' Obama said. 'The best way to keep America safe is not to threaten terrorists with nuclear weapons — it's to keep nuclear weapons and nuclear materials away from terrorists,' the Illinois senator said. Aides said the process Obama envisions would take many years, not just a a single presidency." Christopher Wills, "Obama urges eliminating nuclear weapons," Associated Press, 2 October 2007
SOURCE: "Enough exercise: is there such a thing?," Artueel Blog, 3 October 2007

WHO: Richard Dawkins, Wiki: "Richard Dawkins ... is a British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and popular science writer who holds the Charles Simonyi Chair for the Public Understanding of Science at the University of Oxford. Dawkins first came to prominence with his 1976 book The Selfish Gene, which popularised the gene-centered view of evolution and introduced the term meme, helping found the field of memetics. ... He has since written several best-selling popular books, and appeared in a number of television and radio programmes, concerning evolutionary biology, creationism, and religion. Dawkins is an outspoken antireligionist, atheist, secular humanist, and sceptic, and he is a supporter of the Brights movement. In a play on Thomas Huxley's epithet "Darwin's bulldog", Dawkins' impassioned advocacy of evolution has earned him the appellation 'Darwin's rottweiler'."
WHY: For this quote: "When you think about how fantastically successful the Jewish lobby has been, though, in fact, they are less numerous I am told - religious Jews anyway - than atheists and [yet they] more or less monopolise American foreign policy as far as many people can see. So if atheists could achieve a small fraction of that influence, the world would be a better place."
FOR THE RECORD: "The accusation of anti-Jewishness is ludicrous, offensive, and one might almost say paranoid. It reminds me of an occasion when I was lecturing on a ship, and I spoke strongly against religion in general, ALL religion. I never once mentioned Jews or Judaism. Yet I heard afterwards that a Jewish member of the audience was going around accusing me of anti-Semitism behind my back. To him, the very word "religion" was apparently synonymous with Judaism, and therefore to be anti-religious was tantamount to being anti-Jewish. I don't know enough about the recent history of Israel/Palestine to be either pro or anti-Zionist, but I do know enough to say that oao's phrase 'current general anti-semitism/anti-zionism', implying as it does that anti-zionism is equivalent to anti-semitism, is offensive to my many Jewish friends who do know a lot about the history of that unhappy region, and who are passionate anti-Zionists." Richard Dawkins, "Comment #36688," RichardDawkins.net : The Official Richard Dawkins Website, 2 May 2007
SOURCE: Paul Halsall, "Is Richard Dawkins an Anti-Semite?," English Eclectic, 1 October 2007

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

New "Anti-Semites" Week of Sept. 20 - Sept. 26 2007

WHO: The European Union
WHY: "The E.U. (European Union) has a record includes culpability for centuries of anti-Semitism, culminating in the Holocaust - through today with its donor monies supporting the Terrorist Arab organizations, nations and proxies."
FOR THE RECORD: The European Union has not existed "for centuries" at all, coming into existence with the signing of the Treaty on the European Union at Maastricht in 1992. The precursor to the EU, the European Community dates from 1957, and its primary precursor, the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), dates from 1952. Neither the EU nor any of its primary precursor organizations even existed during the Holocaust, much less "for centuries." Juan Carlos Ocaña, "Chronology," The history of the European Union, The European Citizenship, 2003. Further, the EU as such, being conscious of the Holocaust of the evils of Anti-Semitism has taken an aggressive stance against it from the outset. European Parliament, "Resolution of the European Parliament on racism, xenophobia, and anti-semitism, B4-0261/94," 27 October 1994, Directorate-General for Research
SOURCE: Emanuel A. Winston, "Dear Christian Friends of Israel," 25 September 2007, NewsReleaseWire.Com

WHO: Clare Short, British MP and former Secretary of State for International Development in Tony Blair's government before resigning in protest over Britain's participation in the invasion of Iraq.
WHY: "Is it any accident that British MP Mrs. Clare Short in the House of Commons attacked the Jews as vicious racists when their only crime she could think of is that the Jews still exist, which she considers an offense to human decency? What right do they have to try to live in peace with the Arabs and constantly thwart every attempt of the Palestinian suicide bombers to annihilate their whole population? She claimed that the Jews practice an even more egregious form of apartheid than what existed in South Africa."
FOR THE RECORD: "I think a settlement on Israel-Palestine is really easy if America backed it. It is a two-state solution, on 67 boundaries with East Jerusalem as the capital of the new Palestinian state. That could all be driven, and of course, because Israel is completely dependent on American arms, money and supplies, if America wanted that settlement, it would be had. Then both people, the Palestinian and the Israeli people, want the two-state solution. I'm afraid the peace we're talking about, just a withdrawal from Gaza and then Prime Minister Sharon planning to take half of the West Bank, will not bring peace. So, we're looking – I’m afraid this is a moment of hope because there’s a cease-fire, but we're going to go on with more and more violence and suffering and support for terrorist action." Clare Short Interviewed by Amy Goodman, "Clare Short On Why She Quit Tony Blair's Government In Protest of the Iraq War & How British Intelligence Spied On UN Chief Kofi Annan," Democracy Now, 15 February 2005
SOURCE: Jackie Mason & Raoul Felder, "An Incurable Disease," The American Spectator, 25 September 2007

WHO: Columbia University
WHY: For inviting Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak on campus.
FOR THE RECORD: "Columbia, as a community dedicated to learning and scholarship, is committed to confronting ideas—to understand the world as it is and as it might be. To fulfill this mission we must respect and defend the rights of our schools, our deans and our faculty to create programming for academic purposes. Necessarily, on occasion this will bring us into contact with beliefs many, most or even all of us will find offensive and even odious. We trust our community, including our students, to be fully capable of dealing with these occasions, through the powers of dialogue and reason." Lee C. Bollinger, "President Bollinger's Statement About President Ahmadinejad's Scheduled Appearance," Columbia University Website, 19 September 2007
SOURCE: Jessica Freiman, "Columbia students protest visit," The Jerusalem Post, 25 September 2007

WHO: The whole University system of New Zealand
WHY: Apparently because two students (Joel Hayward and Hans Kupka), at two universities (University of Canterbury & Waikato University) were accused of writing papers dealing with Holocaust Denial. In the case of Hayward, apparently he wrote a Masters thesis that constituted Holocaust Revisionism and in the case of Kupka, he was merely accused of being a Holocaust Denier.
FOR THE RECORD: "A wide-sweeping claim that New Zealand universities suffer from chronic anti-Semitism has been made in a book, World’s Apart: The Re-Migration of South African Jews, by a South African-Australian academic, Colin Tatz, and reported in the current issue of Education Review. Education Review says that, in a section on contemporary anti-Semitism in the book, Tatz describes two controversial cases, one each at the Universities of Waikato and Canterbury, and what he says was the associated “ill grace, impatience and disdain of senior academics with Jews”. The first case, that of Joel Hayward’s 1993 MA thesis on the fate of Jews in German hands, was contested in 1999 by the New Zealand Jewish Council, which unsuccessfully asked the University of Canterbury to revoke the thesis because of it’s Holocaust-denying nature The second case, an acceptance by Waikato for Hans Kupka to undertake a PhD study on the German language in New Zealand, including interviews with Holocaust survivors, provoked an outcry in 2000 when it was alleged Kupka had neo-Nazi links and ran a Holocaust-denying website. Asked if his conclusions about New Zealand’s universities were too harsh, Tatz told Education Review that the Hayward and Kupka cases had precedent, including a call by the University of Otago Medical School in the 1930s for New Zealand not to accept Jewish doctors. Tatz told Education Review that a “wide supporting cast” of academics and managers in the universities involved had been guilty of failing to take the concerns of Jews and others seriously. Despite his claim of chronic anti-Semitism, however, Tatz goes on to say that his verdict on New Zealand universities is generally positive as the two cases cited were not swept under the carpet, university staff were not punished for whistle blowing and the processes that surrounded the cases were remarkably open. The University of Canterbury told Tertiary Update that it stands by the statement it made on 20 December 2000 on the release of the report by the Hayward Thesis Working Party that it does not support Holocaust revisionism and does not harbour anti-Semitic feeling." Association of University Staff, "AUS Tertiary Update," The Scoop, 20 September 2007
SOURCE: Tara Ross, "Visitor accuses universities of anti-semitism," Stuff.Co.NZ, 24 September 2007

WHO: Apparently everyone who the author combines into some sort of weird conspiracy of "Sinisterism;" more specifically: "totalitarians living off our dime;" "Nazi or a Bolshevik or a Fascist;" "defender of Earth against Global Warming;" "a jihadist trying to murder Israelis or a slave of Kim Jong Il sending nuclear material to Syria;" the "Far Left;" "really nasty evil people;" "Syria, Iran, and North Korea;" "Al-Qaeda in Iraq;" "tenured university professors who try to indoctrinate or, in the alternative, drive out all non-totalitarian thought from our useless, nazified universities;" "'journalist' for the New Your [sic] Times or a 'commentator' from MSNBC;" "'liberator' from Yankee Imperialism, closing private schools in Venezuela;" and so on and so forth. The sole exception to the "Sinisterist" conspiracy appears to be the "mythical and nonexistent 'Far Right'"
WHY: It would seem the "Sinisterists": "Do they hate Jews? (Do they defend Palestinians and excuse homicide bombers?) Do they hate Christians and either murder them in foreign lands or harass them at every moment in American cultural life? Do they hate Israel and engage in such outrages as academic boycotts of Israel and divestment of assets in Israel? Do they hate America or at least always blame America first? ... What offends Sinisterists is that the Jewish people have survived. What offends Sinisterists is that Christians believe in Christ and have survived their own many holocausts. What offends Sinisterists is that Israel thrives as the only free, democracy which honors the rule of law. What offends Sinisterists is that America is the only nation which, as Fred Thompson has said, has spent more blood and treasure liberating people than any nation in history."
FOR THE RECORD: The idea of simply lumping everyone you don't like into a mythical "anti-you" conspiracy of evil - very much like George Bush's "Axis of Evil" - is a common ploy used by people that are too stupid or too lazy to actually educate themselves about the people they don't like. This wack job is completely and utterly oblivious to anything and everything outside of those subjective notions that he personally prefers as the article in question graphically illustrates. Why learn about facts when you can just make up crap that sounds good and gives you an good excuse to wallow in your own ignorance?
SOURCE: Bruce Walker, "The Dangerous Cocktail of Global Sinisterism," NewsByUs, 20 September 2007

WHO: Micah Lubens, a Jewish sophomore at George Washington University
WHY: "Lubens is running for president of the Residential Advisory Council [Of Fulbright Hall] and is being criticized by neighbors and house scholars for pointing out the differences between himself and Adolf Hitler in his campaign materials. He printed and hung the campaign posters Monday afternoon, prompting Jewish leaders on campus to voice their concerns. ... 'Vote for Micah Lubens for RAC President because hey he couldn't be worse than Hitler.' ... An image of Lubens, who is Jewish, is featured below the Nazi dictator - wearing a football jersey surfing Facebook on his computer. 'Anti-Semitism is unacceptable and inappropriate, and even more so when it comes from a Jewish student,' said sophomore Arielle Krieger, communications director for the Jewish Student Association. 'I think (Lubens being Jewish) even makes it worse because it provokes and encourages others.'"
FOR THE RECORD: "Lubens said students tore down most of his signs Tuesday evening. While he understands why students are offended, he thinks many are merely shocked by Hitler's image. 'I'm not saying that Hitler was a good guy. I'm saying Hitler was a bad guy and I couldn't be worse than Hitler,' Lubens said. 'It was a sick joke, I agree, but for there to be such outrage, I don't agree with that.' The University did not discipline Lubens, and nor was he disqualified from the election - which took place Wednesday. He said he is still confident he will win. The results of the election were not available by press time."
SOURCE: Eric Roper, "Hitler photo used in campaign," GWHatchet, 20 September 2007

WHO: Pluto Press and the University of Michigan for distributing Pluto books.
WHY: "Among more than four hundred Pluto publications, no single pro-Israel text appears. Instead, the University of Michigan Press provides American readers with Sara Roy's 2006 Failing Peace: Gaza and the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict, dedicated to Edward Said, a work blaming every single Olso failure on Israel. Or, For Zion's Sake: The Judeo-Christian Tradition in American Culture, an attack on Christian Zionism and 'the steadfast US commitment to the establishment of the state of Israel and to its aggressive expansion...' Or, Hamas, A Beginner's Guide, a propagandist apology so favorable it approaches a recruitment manual."
FOR THE RECORD: "Pluto Press has a proud history of publishing the very best in progressive, critical thinking across politics and the social sciences. We are an independent company based in London, with a sales and marketing office in the United States and distribution rights throughout the world. Pluto Press has always had a radical political agenda. Founded in 1969 as a publishing arm of International Socialism, the forerunner of the Socialist Workers Party in the UK, in 1979 we broke with this political affiliation and became truly independent. Today, we represent authors from a wide range of progressive political viewpoints. With over 550 titles in print, Pluto Press is one of the world's leading radical book publishers. We publish more than 70 new titles each year." Pluto Press, "About Pluto Press," Pluto Press Website, undated
SOURCE: StandWithUs, "Radical Anti-Israel Author Distributed By University of Michigan Press," StandWithUs Michigan Newsletter, August 2007

WHO: Israel Shahak, "recently deceased, was professor emeritus of chemistry at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem...."
WHY: "He spent most of his career promoting naked antisemitism and his writings appear on neo-Nazi and Holocaust denial websites around the world. (Jewish antisemite may sound like an oxymoron but Shahak proved it is not.) He went beyond the simple endorsement of Arab positions, something common among other Israeli academic leftists, and also well beyond mere chic anti-Zionism. He openly hated Judaism and Jews. His writings center around the theme that Judaism is the fountain of all evil and that most of the world’s problems can ultimately be traced back to Judaism. He propounded the thesis that Judaism is a racist form of irrational anti-Gentile hatred."
FOR THE RECORD: "I am writing these lines in memoriam for my dear friend and comrade Dr. Israel Shahak, who died on July 2. His home on Bartenura Street in Jerusalem was a library of information about the human rights of the oppressed. The families of prisoners, the staff of closed and censored publications, the victims of eviction and confiscation--none were ever turned away. I have met influential "civil society" Palestinians alive today who were protected as students when Israel was a professor of chemistry at the Hebrew University; from him they learned never to generalize about Jews. And they respected him not just for his consistent stand against discrimination but also because--he never condescended to them. He detested nationalism and religion and made no secret of his contempt for the grasping Arafat entourage. But, as he once put it to me, "I will now only meet with Palestinian spokesmen when we are out of the country. I have some severe criticisms to present to them. But I cannot do this while they are living under occupation and I can 'visit' them as a privileged citizen." This apparently small point of ethical etiquette contains almost the whole dimension of what is missing from our present discourse: the element of elementary dignity and genuine mutual recognition." Christopher Hitchens, "Israel Shahak, 1933-2001," The Nation, July 12, 2001 (July 23, 2001 issue)
SOURCE: 'Anti-Racist Blog,' "Racist Prof. Joel Kovel Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg: University of Michigan Also Connected to Jew Hater Israel Shahak Through Pluto Press Agreement," Anti-Racist Blog: Exposing Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism on American College Campuses, 24 September 2007

WHO: The Los Angeles City Planning Commission, the Los Angeles Dept. of Building and Safety and the Hancock Park Homeowners Association
WHY: "In a move reminiscent of the cowardly sneak attack on Israel during Yom Kippur 1973; Los Angeles officials moved in on Kehillat Yavneh during the Kol Nidrei services to shut it down. City of Los Angeles officials; claiming that the congregation was violating its permit by holding services after its 8pm time limit, ordered the congregants to vacate the congregation at 8:05pm. Congregation Kehillat Yavneh which is part of the prestigious Yeshivat Yavneh has been battling archaic and arbitrary zoning regulations for years. At last count, Yavneh was permitted to hold services up until 10pm on weekdays and 8pm on weekends. With Yom Kippur; the holiest day of the Jewish calendar being celebrated this year on a rare Friday night the shock of having armed officials order its closure is nothing short of blatant anti Semitism."
FOR THE RECORD: "Rabbi Daniel Korobkin was conducting Kol Nidrei services for some 200 Orthodox worshippers at Yeshivas Yavneh last Friday, when shortly after 8 p.m. two inspectors from the Los Angeles City Department of Building and Safety walked into the lobby. One inspector told a startled congregant that the service had run past the 8 p.m. closing time and that therefore the premises had to be vacated immediately. ... The roots of the potentially explosive incident lie in a bitter eight-year-old feud in the Hancock Park neighborhood, an upscale enclave of stately homes. ... Many longtime residents, including Jewish families, resented the intrusion and feared that the prayer services would expand into a full-fledged congregation. After considerable acrimony, Yavneh and the Hancock Park Homeowners Association agreed on a municipal conditional use permit. ... The caller notified the city that on the eve of Yom Kippur the stipulated 8 p.m. closing time for services would likely be violated. The complaint was handled at the lower levels of the building and safety department as a routine matter, according to spokesman David Keim, with the result that the two inspectors showed up during the Kol Nidrei service. ... "I am not saying this is necessarily anti-Semitism, but a city department made the intentional decision that the holiest day in the Jewish calendar would be the best time to catch worshippers in a minute violation," he said. Jolene Snet, a Jewish neighbor of the school and long active in the Hancock Park Homeowners Association, was not aware of the Friday incident and labeled it unfortunate. However, she said, "I believe as a citizen that Yavneh should comply fully with the terms of the conditional use permit." Tom Tugend, "City Building & Safety inspectors briefly interrupt Kol Nidrei services at Hancock Park shul," Jewish Journal, 25 September 2007
SOURCE: "UPDATED 1:45AM EST: Exclusive to Yeshivaworld: City of Los Angeles Anti Semitism Rears Its Ugly Head During Kol Nidrei," Yeshiva World News, 23 September 2007

WHO: John Mearsheimer, Stephen Walt, and Jimmy Carter
WHY: Mearsheimer and Walt for writing the new book, "The Israel Lobby" and former president Carter for writing "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid"
FOR THE RECORD: There is nothing even vaguely anti-Jewish about either of these books. The Mearsheimer-Walt book is just a factual portrayal (extensively documented throughout) of the Israel lobby in the United States and its influence and the Carter book is just a personal reflection on the Israel/Palestine issue. Neither of which are even anti-Zionist, much less anti-Semitic by any objective standard.
SOURCE: Anne Liebermann, "Whatever shall we do about Walt & Mearsheimer? cont'd," Boker Tov Boulder, 24 September 2007,

WHO: People who call themselves "Progressive" and most Democrats
WHY: Not much detail is given, but apparently the comments of Rep. Jim Moran (see last week) is the example: "In February of 2006 I wrote multiple articles warning the American Jewish community to wake up and realize that support for Israel was dwindling within the Democratic Party and blatant anti-Semitism was prevalent amongst the Progressive wing of the Party. A year and half later the term Progressive is now synonymous with anti-Semite, but the Democratic Party leadership may have woken up to the fact that they need to begin condemning the "blame the Jews" rhetoric stemming amongst some of their members."
FOR THE RECORD: This is just Right-wing slander without even the slightest pretense to reality.
SOURCE: 'Paulie,' "Democrats blast one of their own...finally!," Paulies Point, 21 September 2007

WHO: Fictional "Ferengi" from the "Star Trek" franchise, various monsters from "Star Wars: The Phantom Menace" movie, and maybe George Lucas?
WHY: "Today I mentioned offhand that I always thought the Ferengi were a Jewish caricature. My (Jewish) co-worker told me he had never considered that, never considered that the grubby, short, big nosed, big eared, money obsessed merchants could possibly be considered offensive. ... I wrote a paper in college about this same issue, what I feel is unconscious racism. ... A hook-nosed, conniving merchant/ slave trader. And what's more, he kind of SOUNDS Jewish. You half-expect him to start complaining about his mother. ... "
FOR THE RECORD: We're not overly concerned with defending the character of completely fictional space monsters.
SOURCE: Idea of Progress, "Racist? Ignorant?," The Idea of Progress, 20 September 2007,

WHO: Julio Pino, Associate Professor of History at Kent State University, Ohio, specializing in Latin American History.
WHY: "Pino is a Muslim extremist who advocates the mass murder of Jews while drawing a paycheck from the hard-working people of the great state of Ohio."
FOR THE RECORD: "A Kent State University faculty member accused of authoring an anti-American Web site said Thursday he 'absolutely' does not support jihad, even though his photo and writings by him appear on the site. ... He joined Kent in 1992 after receiving a doctorate at the University of California at Los Angeles. He converted to Islam in 2000. He received tenure -- a coveted academic appointment that in essence means lifetime employment -- several years ago for significant research and professional activities. ... 'He's a good professor,' said Chris Sutherland, a senior from Cuyahoga Falls. 'He's got a broad outlook, and he seems to know what he's talking about. He's funny, goofy.' Bill Hammerstorm, a senior from Hudson, said he was 'completely surprised' to see Pino linked to a jihadist Web site. 'It doesn't seem like it would be him,' he said. In a media release, KSU officials did not comment directly on the clamor to dismiss Pino. 'As any employer, when deciding whether an employee should be terminated, we have a responsibility to follow proper processes,' the release said." Staff Writer, "Kent State denies ties to jihadi site," Akron Beacon Journal, 1 March 2007
SOURCE: Mike Adams, "Pino 911," FrontPage Magazine, 26 September 2007

WHO: Noam Chomsky, joined the staff of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1955 and in 1961 was appointed full professor in the Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics (now the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.) From 1966 to 1976 he held the Ferrari P. Ward Professorship of Modern Languages and Linguistics. In 1976 he was appointed Institute Professor. Professor Chomsky has received honorary degrees from University of London, University of Chicago, Loyola University of Chicago, Swarthmore College, Delhi University, Bard College, University of Massachusetts, University of Pennsylvania, Georgetown University, Amherst College, Cambridge University, University of Buenos Aires, McGill University, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Tarragona, Columbia University, University of Connecticut, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, University of Western Ontario, University of Toronto, Harvard University, University of Calcutta, and Universidad Nacional De Colombia. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the National Academy of Science. In addition, he is a member of other professional and learned societies in the United States and abroad, and is a recipient of the Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award of the American Psychological Association, the Kyoto Prize in Basic Sciences, the Helmholtz Medal, the Dorothy Eldridge Peacemaker Award, the Ben Franklin Medal in Computer and Cognitive Science, and others. Chomsky has written and lectured widely on linguistics, philosophy, intellectual history, contemporary issues, international affairs and U.S. foreign policy.
WHY: "Noam Chomsky, the discredited linguistics professor at MIT, is one of the worst anti-Semites on earth. Son of a Jewish Hebrew teacher, Chomsky is a dogmatic Stalinist who hates Jews, Israel and the United States. ... He endorses terror attacks against Jews. He leads the campaign of support for Neo-Nazi Norman Finkelstein. ..."
FOR THE RECORD: "Alongside his career as a linguist, Chomsky has been active in left-wing politics. In 1965 he organized a citizen's committee to publicize tax refusal in protest to the war in Vietnam; four years later he published his first book on politics American Power and the New Mandarins. By the 1980's he had become both the most distinguished figure of American linguistics and one of the most influential left-wing critics of American foreign policy. He has been extremely prolific as a writer: his web-site in 2003 listed 33 book publications in linguistics (broadly construed), and although the individuation of his political books is complicated, their number definitely exceeds 40. According to a 1992 tabulation of sources from the previous 12 years in the Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Chomsky was the most frequently-cited person alive, and one of the eight most frequently-cited authors of all time. Chomsky's intellectual life had been divided between his work in linguistics and his political activism, philosophy coming as a distant third. Nonetheless, his influence among analytic philosophers has been enormous due to three factors. First, Chomsky contributed substantially to a major methodological shift in the human sciences, turning away from the prevailing empiricism of the middle of the twentieth century: behaviorism in psychology, structuralism in linguistics and positivism in philosophy. Second, his groundbreaking books on syntax (Chomsky (1957, 1965)) laid a conceptual foundation for a new, cognitivist approach to linguistics and provided philosophers with a new framework for thinking about human language and the mind. And finally, he has persistently defended his views against all takers, engaging in important debates with many of the major figures in analytic philosophy (Tyler Burge, Donald Davidson, Michael Dummett, Saul Kripke, Thomas Nagel, Hilary Putnam, Willard Van Orman Quine, John Searle, to cite a few) throughout his career." In Ernest LePore (ed.), Dictionary of Modern American Philosophers, 1860-1960, Bristol, 2004
SOURCE: Steven Plaut, "Chomsky and the Jewish er I mean Gilmore Girl Problem," Back to Sanity (Arutz Sheva), 26 September 2007

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

New "Anti-Semites" Week of Sept. 13 - Sept. 19 2007

WHO: Joel Kovel, "teaches at Bard College in New York, has written 10 books, ran for the Green nomination to be president of the United States and edits Capitalism Nature Socialism..."
WHY: For having the audacity to write the book "Overcoming Zionism: Creating a Single Democratic State in Israel/Palestine" that questions the ethno-national ideology of Zionism.
FOR THE RECORD: Joel Kovel is ethnically Jewish and: "As an activist, Joel Kovel has been engaged in struggles for peace and justice since the Vietnam War era. He has worked within the antiwar and antinuclear movements, the solidarity movements in Central America and the Caribbean, the movements for democratic media, and, increasingly, for ecological transformation. He lived in Nicaragua for a period in 1986, and accompanied Pastors for Peace as they broke the US blockade on Cuba in their 1994 Friendshipment."
SOURCE: Andrew MacLeod, "Unwelcome Questions," Monday Magazine, 19 September 2007

WHO: Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA), US House of Representatives, http://moran.house.gov/
WHY: "...telling a Jewish magazine that the pro-Israel lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, was enormously influential in pushing for war in Iraq. He also said AIPAC’s 'ties to certain newspapers and magazines and individuals in the media are substantial and intimidating.'"
FOR THE RECORD: "Jewish Americans, as a voting bloc and as an influence on American foreign policy, are overwhelmingly opposed to the war. There is no ethnic group as opposed to the war as much as Jewish Americans. But, AIPAC is the most powerful lobby and has pushed this war from the beginning. I don’t think they represent the mainstream of American Jewish thinking at all, but because they are so well organized, and their members are extraordinarily powerful—most of them are quite wealthy—they have been able to exert power." Ann El Khoury, "Rabbi Lerner and Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA) on AIPAC’s influence," Reclaiming Space, 16 September 2007
SOURCE: Josephine Hearn, "Moran Should 'retract His Remarks' About Israel Lobby, Hoyer Says," The Politico, 19 September 2007,

WHO: Deputy Cornelius Blue of the Seminole County Sheriff's Department (Florida)
WHY: For investigating parking complaints: "The situation started about 7:30 p.m. as an investigation into parking complaints in the subdivision, which is just north of the UCF campus. Several 911 calls were made reporting that numerous cars were parked illegally along the narrow streets that run through the middle-class neighborhood. Since March, deputies have responded to a dozen similar complaints at the house, which Lipskar has used to hold Saturday Sabbath services. ... Karen Wong, who lives a half-block from Lipskar, said the complaints from neighbors have nothing to do with Jewish services and everything to do with parking. 'They are blocking the sidewalks, blocking the fire hydrant, blocking driveways,' she said."
FOR THE RECORD: For interrupting the Rosh Hashanah service, the deputy and other witnesses were "called a Nazi, an anti-Semite and a racist," soon afterward "the crowd grew disorderly after one woman in the crowd stated, 'I hate the police; this is ridiculous.' ... Lemma said Blue handled the situation well, having first tried to persuade Lipskar and his followers to park at nearby Hagerty High School and walk a quarter-mile back to the neighborhood. 'The deputy could have taken action [to issue tickets and tow cars] earlier, but he chose to handle it in a more diplomatic way,' he said. 'Obviously we wish the situation would have happened differently, but the bottom line is he had the legal right to respond at the level that he did.'"
SOURCE: Robert Perez, "ACLU joins quarrel over parking at rabbi's home," Orlando Sentinel, 14 September 2007

WHO: Tim Tyler, "the US Navy's Israel desk officer during the 1973 Yom Kippur War as a young naval officer, before he joined the Pentagon's secretive Defence Security Assistance Agency, where he performed various important roles including that of chief of the Middle East South Asia Division. He then worked at Nato as a defence planner with special expertise in Pershing II and cruise-missile deployment, before returning to the Pentagon to be "deputy director plans", when he was directly involved in international sales of major weapons systems."
WHY: "In the 1980s he recommended that the Pentagon stop funding the development of Israel's own multibillion dollar Lavi jet fighter, but offer them America's own F-16s instead. His recommendation, much to the fury of the Israelis, worked its way up the Pentagon hierarchy and was eventually accepted."
FOR THE RECORD: "Through all of this I remained friends with Marvin Klemow [negotiator for the Israelis] and one holiday I was at his house for a party. It was a good party, and the only slight hiccup was the rather brusque manner of an Israeli colonel who was there - but I thought nothing of it. Then Marv pulled me aside. He said something along the lines of, 'You won't believe this, but I just got chewed out for inviting you to this party.' I asked him why, and he told me that he had just been informed that I was on the [Israeli] embassy's anti-Semite list because I didn't support the Lavi programme. We were both flabbergasted. But, sadly, I was never invited back to Marv's house."
SOURCE: Andrew Stephen, "Saying the unsayable," The New Statesman, 13 September 2007,

WHO: Wilhelmine Bennett, author of a letter to the editor to the Des Moines Register
WHY: For having the audacity to mention the Al Nakba, the thoroughly documented ethnic cleansing of Palestine by Israelis in 1948
FOR THE RECORD: The letter itself, "U.S. is party to ethnic cleansing in Palestine" is online and has nothing even vaguely anti-Jewish about it.
SOURCE: Oscar Volij and James Eaves-Johnson, "Anti-Semitic letter ignores truth and spreads hate," Des Moines Register, 18 September 2007

WHO: The government of Syria
WHY: No actual reason was cited, just the bald statement by a US official that Syria holds "the most barbaric anti-Semitic views." Presumably this is because they object to the Israeli occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights, invaded and occupied by Israel in 1967.
FOR THE RECORD: There is no denying that the Syrian government is an enemy to Israel.
SOURCE: Barak Ravid and Yoav Stern, "U.S. official says Syria should be barred from regional summit," Ha'aretz, 18 September 2007

WHO: The Lithuanian government, the Lithuanian Prosecutor General's Office, and the Republika newspaper
WHY: For having the audacity to threaten to question an Israeli Holocaust researcher for possible war crimes while serving as a Soviet secret police partisan leader in Lithuania during the World War II.
FOR THE RECORD: "Lithuania has requested that the Israeli authorities facilitate the questioning of prominent historian and Holocaust researcher Yitzhak Arad regarding his partisan past during World War II and his supposed subsequent service for the Soviet NKVD security police. 'The pretrial investigation documents of this criminal case include enough data to assume that the suspect Yitzhak Arad might have committed criminal deeds in Lithuania," the Lithuanian Prosecutor General's Office said in a press release. According to the Lithuanian prosecution authorities, Arad joined a Soviet partisan squad while Lithuania was occupied by Nazi Germany and then served with the NKVD. He is suspected of involvement in executions of Lithuanian civilians and members of the anti-Soviet resistance movement, the statement says." Inter-Fax News, "Lithuania suspects prominent Israeli Holocaust researcher of war crimesduring WWII," Inter-Fax News, 11 September 2007
SOURCE: Baruch Shuv, "Lithuanian chutzpah," Ha'aretz, 18 September 2007

WHO: Apparently a significant number of Israeli teenagers
WHY: In this case they do appear to be real anti-Semites, i.e. people who hate Jews, that just happen to be Jewish enough to qualify for Israeli citizenship under the racial elements of the Israeli "Law of Return." Generally we don't really put actual Jew haters on "Who's an Anti-Semite this Week?" but the sheer irony of this has led to an exception.
FOR THE RECORD: "Neo-Nazis attacked a 70-year-old woman ... in Haifa; a family from Neveh Yosef, ... was victimized by Nazi activity; [In] the town of Migdal Haemek, .... A 17-year-old anti-Semite was caught Sunday spraying a swastika on a neighbor’s car; Nazi grafitti was found Sunday on walls in the town of Holon, near Tel Aviv; the Beit Ephraim synagogue in the northern Negev city of Dimona last Friday discovered their house of worship painted with Nazi symbols. ... Nazi and Christian slogans were scrawled on the walls of a Sephardic synagogue in the resort city of Eilat; spray-painting swastikas on tombstones in the Eilat cemetery. ... Last week eight teenage members of a neo-Nazi cell in Petach Tikva were indicted in Tel Aviv District Court... . “Nazi Eli” Buyanitov was also charged with a count of battery. ..."
SOURCE: Hana Levi Julian, "Neo-Nazi Attacks Raise Red Flags in Jewish State," Arutz Sheva Online, 18 September 2007

WHO: Roald Dahl, author of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" and "James and the Giant Peach"
WHY: "There’s no explanation of what the user concerns actually were, but the New York Sun speculates that it might have been due to allegations that Roald Dahl was anti-semitic, and that the timing of the logo also coincided with Jewish holiday Rosh Hashanah which started at sundown the day before."
FOR THE RECORD: Nothing much to add.
SOURCE: Philipp Lenssen, "Google’s Roald Dahl Logo Was Pulled," Google Blogoscoped, 17 September 2007

WHO: William Shakespeare, English playwright
WHY: "But is Shakespeare's an anti-semitic text? Deep into rehearsal, I am shocked by Shylock's lines to the Court, as he damns Venetian (and of course English) society for slavery. Shakespeare allows the Jew to criticise white racism and then the Jew is punished by being stripped of his wealth and identity. Is this Shakespeare, like Marlowe, enjoying Shylock's punishment in keeping with the spirit of the time? Or is it a critique of white European supremacy?"
FOR THE RECORD: "Our quest, through the Council of Christians and Jews, is towards greater understanding between peoples. Though his Shylock is hardly more admirable than Marlowe's Barabas, Shakespeare, by his courage, honesty and insight in confronting the most vital issues of human co-existence, serves, as few others could, to show us the way." Jack Opie, "Antisemitism in English Literature: The Shakespeare Case," International Council of Christians and Jews, 2007
SOURCE: Julia Pascal, "How do you solve a problem like Shylock?," The Guardian, 17 September 2007

WHO: Prof. Norman Finkelstein, http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/
WHY: "Finkelstein is not a scholar of any sort, but rather is a full time anti-Semitic propagandist and generator of hate screeds."
FOR THE RECORD: "While Finkelstein has long been controversial off the DePaul campus, he was popular with his students and even his critics at the university acknowledged that he was an excellent teacher. The case is also frequently portrayed as one in which Finkelstein (a leftist critic of Israel) is allied against conservative supporters of Israel, but it's not so neat. Some academics who strongly disagree with Finkelstein's views have said his academic freedom was violated in the tenure review, and some academics who share Finkelstein's politics have questioned his scholarship." Scott Jaschik, "Finkelstein and DePaul Settle," Inside Higher Ed
SOURCE: Steven Plaut, "The Passion of Norman Finkelstein," FrontPage, 17 September 2007